By the Spirit, We See the Cross

Is the Cross a Spectacle?

In an ocularcentric tradition like ours, is it even acceptable to convey the unseen cross into our dialog? Can the cross be a spectacle for us at present? None of us noticed it. We now solely examine it.

The problems confronted by the early Galatian Christians will help us kind these points at present. The Galatian church had fallen underneath the spell of a false promise of redemption: Christ plus the works of the regulation. They have been fumbling the gospel, abandoning Christ, and it was an absurd transfer. How may they fall for the bewitching hallucination of a false gospel, as if Christ’s cross was inadequate? Particularly when Paul instructed them, “It was before your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified” (Gal. 3:1). But all of the proof means that the Galatians weren’t current for the crucifixion occasion.

However for us, the cross is the pedagogy of religion, not of sight.

The Gospel Preached by Paul

So how did Paul declare that the Galatian church noticed Christ crucified earlier than their eyes as if it have been publicly portrayed on a metropolis billboard (προγράφω)? Maybe he meant the symbolism of the Lord’s Desk, the place the cross takes kind in seen image. However I doubt this explains it. Quite, Paul’s declare was that the Galatian church noticed Christ crucified by the passionate, Christ-centered preaching of Paul. By means of Paul’s impassioned preaching, the cross, although far off in time and area, drew shut and current. Simply how visually graphic Paul obtained in his preaching of the main points of Calvary isn’t clear, however we do see right here that Christ’s loss of life turned current to them—“so vividly and so impressively that his hearers imagined the matter to have happened right before their eyes.”1

It’s too hasty to jot down off these sermons as apostolic theatrics. As an alternative Paul’s sermonic depiction of the crucifixion of Christ was a feat of rhetography (or ekphrasis), the awakening of the pictorial creativeness by intense descriptive powers in order that the cross of Christ captured the Galatian Christian’s creativeness with vivid drive. Paul may solely replicate on these moments by using the optical metaphors of seeing, as if the spectacle of the cross was visually set earlier than their eyes, even when it wasn’t.

Religion Not Sight

Even at present, the daring and clear preaching of the cross materializes the spectacle of the cross earlier than a congregation, for these with the religion to see it. By the Spirit we see the spectacle of the cross—for we see the cross of Christ even at present by devoted sermons and books and albums when the message of the cross is attended with appropriate majesty. That is Paul’s intention—that we too would see Christ, beholding his majesty and glory.

But this nice Spectacle stays invisible. It’s a distinct mark of Christians, who don’t merely have a look at what might be seen however who gaze into realms of unseen glory.2 By this religion we’re crammed with an inexpressible pleasure in Christ, a pleasure harking back to the enjoyment of the primary believers who bodily noticed Christ on earth.3 However for us, the cross is the pedagogy of religion, not of sight. At Calvary, “Satan triumphed visibly, but Christ triumphed invisibly.”4 For this reason Bible films and cinematic recreations of the cross add nothing to the spectacle of the cross and too typically take away from it, leaving us with graphic imagery of a person’s defeat and bodily torture however deflating the spectacle of its most hanging glories—unable to depict for the display Christ’s divinity or his distinctive work as atoning priest, wrath-bearing Savior, Passover lamb, crushed servant, Serpent smasher, cosmic warrior, forerunner of the second exodus, and alpha of the brand new creation.

Our world says that seeing is believing, however for us to behold the deep glory of the cross, we should see as God sees moderately than as man sees. We treasure what’s invisible, and that’s maybe the best supply of the spectacle pressure on this age and of the Christian life. The nice spectacle of Christ crucified is a spectacle for the ear, not a spectacle for the attention. For religion comes not by seeing, however by listening to.5

Notes:
1. Hans Dieter Betz, Galatians: A Commentary to Paul’s Letter to the Church buildings in Galatia (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979), 131.
2. 2 Cor. 4:18.
3. 1 Pet. 1:8–9.
4. Thomas Manton, The Full Works of Thomas Manton (London: James Nisbet, 1874), 18:213.
5. Rom. 10:14–21; Gal. 3:1–5.

This text is customized from Competing Spectacles: Treasuring Christ within the Digital Age by Tony Reinke.



Associated Articles