The next is an uncorrected transcript generated by a transcription service. Earlier than quoting in print, please verify the corresponding audio for accuracy.
Collin Hansen: Those that have obtained grace lengthen grace to others. Sounds good, however it’s not all the time true. The particular person whose meal was paid for by a stranger doesn’t all the time cross it on. The one that merges on a busy freeway doesn’t all the time let the subsequent particular person in. The final immigrant needs to shut the door on the subsequent immigrant. Generally we wish grace for ourselves however not for others, however a real grasp of the gospel of grace adjustments not solely our everlasting standing but additionally our current observe. After we perceive grace as a present, we neither sought nor deserve. We can not look down on anybody else and we are able to by no means lose hope for anybody else. Nobody might be past the hope of the identical energy that raised Jesus Christ from the useless.
My visitor on at present’s episode of “The Gospel Coalition Podcast” is Stephen Um. He’s the senior minister of Citylife Presbyterian Church in Boston and a council member of The Gospel Coalition. He’s additionally the author and presenter of Gospel Formed Mercy, a small group video and e book examine revealed by TGC with The Good E-book Firm. It’s primarily based on level 5, the doing of justice and mercy, from TGC’s 5 factors of gospel-centered ministry. I’m going to ask him in regards to the relationship between widespread and everlasting good, about how the gospel empowers church buildings that search the salvation of souls and in addition, the aid of poverty, starvation, and injustice. Stephen, thanks for becoming a member of me.
Stephen Um: My pleasure, Collin.
Hansen: All proper, let’s leap proper in. Why is that this assertion of TGC’s Basis Paperwork so controversial? Let me quote it, “Christian churches must work for justice and peace in their neighborhoods through service, even as they call individuals to conversion and the new birth.”
Um: Properly, I believe Collin, the assertion itself is basically not the difficulty. I believe confusion occurs when individuals work with completely different classes. They’ve completely different classes in thoughts after they speak about problems with justice and peace of their neighborhoods. To uphold the decision for the good fee is to not deny this assertion, however oftentimes individuals really feel uncomfortable with the assertion or wanting extra readability as a result of they’re saying that they’re asking the query, “What is the mission of the church?” So, serving to the poor, doing justice is a part of the broader commandments Jesus taught, like loving your youngsters and your spouse. However we’d by no means say parenting or spousal love is the mission of the church. However these are the commandments that Christians are purported to obey. So, these are the sorts of discussions and I believe there must be higher readability. And I believe the controversy comes when there isn’t readability and when persons are mixing the completely different classes as a result of we shouldn’t say that the good commandment is the good fee and we shouldn’t say the good fee is the good commandment, however however, they have to be held collectively as Christians take into consideration what our accountability is.
And as we take into consideration what the mission of the church is, we have now to ensure that we use the precise classes. And I believe that there’s been lots of confusion with Christians and then you definitely get a response from that the place they are saying, “Well, then they were going to move a little further away, even over the issues of social justice because we’re afraid that the call that the church has in being the church and responding to the mission of the church might get jeopardized.” So, I believe that that’s why the controversy is there however it shouldn’t be.
Hansen:So, I’m going to present you a presentation of, I believe the logic that works for individuals and…or I ought to say, a minimum of the logic that they observe. I don’t agree with it however I believe it’s pretty widespread and I believe we must always handle it. So, if souls final endlessly, and I believe we are able to additionally embrace their our bodies, however let’s simply speak about…if the souls final endlessly and Jesus mentioned, “We’ll always have the poor with us then.” Then why, Stephen, wouldn’t we make investments all of our energies into evangelism?
Um: No, I’d say, effectively, I really agree with that assertion that we must always make investments our energies into evangelism as a result of that’s what we’re known as to do as a church, to interact in making disciples of all nations and evangelizing and caring about individuals’s souls. However we have now to watch out that we’re not speaking in regards to the separation of physique and spirit. The Son of Man incarnated on this earth, the fabric life issues due to who he’s and he was in a position to accomplish every little thing by his bodily dying and resurrection. So, evangelism completely, Collin, is a excessive precedence and we’re commissioned to take action, however on the identical time, we’re commanded to like our neighbor. And there, once more, as that verse is taken extra from John 12 the place it says, “Always have the poor with us.”
Judas was wrongly pitting caring for the poor with Mary’s actions. And Jesus shouldn’t be saying don’t look after the poor, that’s not his level there. However her actions, Mary’s actions are necessary at this second as a result of she’s making ready the day of his burial. And so once more, I don’t suppose that these items have to be pitted towards each other. However I believe a part of the issue right here is that, and Keller had a bit of two-minute video on this someplace the place he says that lots of our Christian concepts about justice and about worth in human life and all of those points, these concepts have been co-opted by our tradition. And since they’ve been co-opted by our tradition, many Christians who will not be pondering as sharply as they need to or persistently to what the Scriptures must say, they merely embrace what the definition of justice is. So, they’ll embrace the tradition’s understanding of social justice, which is ambiguous. It’s actually, actually laborious to get your arms on it and simply assume that that’s the identical factor as a biblical justice.
And so, I believe that once we’re speaking about these points about justice and about demonstrating mercy, we have now to, once more, get the classes proper. We have to notice that Jesus commanded us, giving us the good fee and giving us the good commandment and people issues have to be held collectively however on the identical time, not complicated the 2. So, the gospel is the gospel, however we have now to watch out that we don’t say that the outcomes of the gospel, a few of the actions and duties that we have now as Christians to have the ability to assist the poor and to care for individuals who are in want and saying that that type of exercise is the gospel. And so, we have now to ensure that we’re in a position to distinguish the 2, regardless that they ought to not be separated.
Hansen:After which one in every of these tensions or definitions pertains to the connection between the widespread and the everlasting good. Do you see any pressure between that when it comes to how as a pastor you attempt to consider your preaching or your utility or your instructing or the cash that you just spend? How do you’re employed by these issues simply as a Christian when it comes to priorities and practices and in addition, then as a church chief?
Um: Properly, we don’t pit widespread grace versus saving grace. So, why ought to we pit widespread good with everlasting good? Once more, I believe every little thing that we do as we take into consideration what it means to be a Christian needs to be carried out within the context of collaborating within the Kingdom of God. And so, oftentimes individuals confuse the church with the dominion. Properly, it’s not as if Jesus reigns over the church and he doesn’t reign over the cosmos and the remainder of the world in creation. After all, he’s the King of every little thing. And so, we have now to remind ourselves to suppose Christianly about every little thing. It’s not that work for human flourishing is just for the pure world, devoid of our dedication to the dominion, and every little thing that we do, we’re doing for the glory of God in His kingly rule by widespread good and everlasting good.
And once more, so once we are responding to the good fee and once we’re responding to the good commandment, we’re doing it as a result of we wish to submit ourselves in obeying God’s phrase and aligning ourselves with the desire of God. So, we have now to watch out that we don’t consider the world by a dualistic lens and that we have now to be very clear about what the truth is. And we stay in a world that’s already and never but. And we have now to make use of the precise classes as we predict by these items.
Hansen:Why do you suppose, Stephen, the dualism is so tempting for us? I imply, my guess can be that particularly for white evangelicals, we’ve been so formed by the debates of the early 20th century when it comes to the social gospel and issues like that, that we’ve created a few of these dichotomies that the Scriptures don’t keep. That’s my guess. Do you have got a unique guess?
Um: Properly, I believe it’s the fleshly impulse to interact in excessive individualism, whether or not it’s on the precise or the left on the ideological spectrum or the theological spectrum. And so, I believe that we have now to understand, sure, God is asking us to acknowledge and having a precedence about these issues that are religious. However that doesn’t imply that subsequently that we ought to not be involved in regards to the materials as a result of God definitely doesn’t have a adverse view on the fabric. I imply, He created it and regardless that it’s fall in and it’ll finally be let out within the new heavens and the brand new earth, that’s the longer term glory because it says in Romans 8. However I believe the potential hazard that some individuals will contemplate is that if we place an excessive amount of emphasis on one which it would deprioritize what’s most necessary. And once more, I believe that’s worthy of warning that we must always adhere to. However that doesn’t imply subsequently that we must utterly dismiss it.
Hansen:The Scriptures appear to prioritize mercy to the family of religion or different believers, a minimum of whenever you’re some passages like Galatians 6:10. However one of many issues our theological imaginative and prescient for ministry says is that we must always sacrificially love our neighbors whether or not or not they share our beliefs. Are these teachings in contradiction or how do they cohere?
Um: No, I imply that’s what Galatians 6:10 says. It says, “So, then as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone.” So, there you have got it. We ought to like our neighbors. And that’s a part of the good commandment that we see in Matthew Chapter 22. However the verse goes on to say, “And especially to those who are of the household of faith.” So, no matter camp that you just’re from, it’s not saying that it’s one over the opposite. No, Apostle Paul locations an emphasis on each. He says, “We have to make sure that we care and do good for those who are of the household of faith. But at the same time, we need to do good to everyone as we have opportunities.” So, the biblical name for doing good to all is obvious. Jesus even calls us to like our enemies. And our theological imaginative and prescient is a factor, don’t love the family of religion. It’s not an both or, however it’s that we have to acknowledge each. And within the E-book of Galatians, we see that there was this pressure between Jews and Gentiles. So, we have to learn to love our neighbors and fellow believers throughout the family of religion and if we’re in a position to learn to do this, then that we are going to be outfitted to know easy methods to love our neighbors who will not be believers.
Hansen: This entire sequence, Stephen, on TGC’s theological imaginative and prescient for ministry has been convicting and difficult to me. Simply studying and rereading. But in addition simply the conversations with you and with different council members and writers and contributors for TGC. And there’s a bit in right here specifically that actually form of caught me off guard and I didn’t know what to do and I noticed I don’t in all probability observe this in actuality as an elder at my native church. Enthusiastic about the membership interviews that I do form of on a quarterly foundation for brand spanking new members in my church. And we require individuals to have the ability to perceive and articulate, a minimum of in written type, salvation by grace alone. However we don’t ask them or look at whether or not they’ve cared for the poor, the deprived. However one of many issues our assertion says is you could’t grasp the gospel except you’ve repented of that indifference to the poor and the deprived. And I simply puzzled, what can we imply by that at TGC? And may that be one thing that I’m asking individuals about?
Um: Yeah. Properly, I believe we must always ask individuals about whether or not or not they’re dwelling out their lives which can be grace motivated. So, if they’ve been redeemed by the blood by work of Jesus by grace by religion in Christ, then it’s going to form the best way we stay our lives. So, we shouldn’t draw back from boldly difficult individuals about all issues of life, as a result of religion with out works is useless. We shouldn’t be afraid simply as James wasn’t afraid. We’re merely desirous to observe the spirit captured in Scripture in regards to the significance of each, gospel understanding on the one hand and gospel dwelling on the opposite. As I mentioned earlier, that we have to ensure that we assist individuals to know the distinction between the gospel and the outcomes of the gospel however on the identical time, regardless that we present them the distinction and we have to distinguish the 2, we even have to speak about how necessary it’s for them to not be separated.
So, that’s, what the gospel is, the gospel does. And if there are causes and there are results and if the gospel is highly effective then there can be outcomes. So, life that has been saved by grace has formed the best way we glance, not solely in the best way that we relate to the marginalized and people people who find themselves weak, however it additionally shapes the best way we take a look at our work, cash, parenting, politics, the poor, the deprived, it form the best way we take a look at every little thing. And I believe that’s what that piece, that line there in that article is making an attempt to convey.
Hansen: One other level right here from our theological imaginative and prescient for ministry, I tweeted this as soon as from TGC’s account and it triggered lots of of us. Right here it’s. And that is fairly pointed. Okay. And I wanna know particularly what that is all about. Right here’s the quote, “Therefore, the person who does not generously give away his or her wealth to others is not merely lacking in compassion but is unjust.” Now, to be clear, one factor it doesn’t say right here give away all wealth, it doesn’t make clear that. However I believe the precise phrase there that actually will get individuals is unjust. What’s that assertion making an attempt to say?
Um: Yeah. Properly, I believe that…nobody thinks that she or he is responsible of the sin of greed. I don’t know when the final time I heard anybody repent of greed and so they may repent of lust, they may repent of different sins, however hardly ever do we predict that we’re extraordinarily grasping. Sure, there may be occasions once we make poor decisions or choices and buying sure issues that aren’t essentially what we’d like, however what we wish. And we’d not be good stewards of the sources that God has given to us. So, at any time when anybody speaks tough reality into individuals’s hearts in suggesting that they’re not as beneficiant as they could possibly be, individuals will all the time reply that approach. So, we shouldn’t be stunned at that. Whether or not it’s by a tweet or whether or not it’s by a sermon or whether or not it’s by an article or a e book, individuals won’t reply effectively to that.
However once we look within the Bible with simply form of surveying the phrase for justice within the Bible 200 plus occasions, it signifies that we must always deal with individuals equitably. And that’s to say that God is a simply God. And whenever you consider God being simply it’s important to consider God being a loving God, that He’s a God who needs to assist these individuals who have been marginalized. And so, if we have now the tendency to be enslaved to cash and we don’t use cash in essentially the most beneficiant approach, and we don’t share as a lot as we must always, and when we’re not conscious of individuals’s wants and we don’t wish to share the entire issues that God has given to us graciously and generously, then we’re not reflecting our God who’s a simply God, who’s a loving God, who needs to look after these people who find themselves in want.
So, , whilst we take into consideration mercy, , we’ll ask the query, “Does this person deserve my mercy?” Properly, that’s the unsuitable query. The query that we needs to be asking is, “Does this person need my mercy?” After all, nobody deserves mercy. We didn’t deserve mercy from a Holy God as a result of we had been sinners and we rebelled towards Him however He demonstrated mercy to us. And subsequently, that’s the place I believe the grace gospel motivation is available in loosening our coronary heart’s tight grip on cash and subsequently inflicting us to be stingy and ungenerous reasonably than being gracious stewards of cash that God has given to us. Not changing into hoarders of all of the sources that He’s given to us, however that we are going to be stewards wanting to extend the masters’ belongings, making good heavenly investments, and recognizing the wants that we see round us and with the ability to meet them to one of the best of our means.
Hansen:Stephen, I believe your solutions are doing this, however as I notice going by my questions, for individuals who don’t know this assertion, this level 5 on gospel-centered ministry from our theological imaginative and prescient for ministry, they won’t perceive that each one of those statements are rooted within the gracious nature of the gospel. So, right here’s one other one, one other standout line there. “We cannot look at the poor and the oppressed and callously call them to pull themselves out of their own difficulty.” Once more, that’s rooted within the gracious nature of the gospel that none of us deserve, however that we obtain out of the gracious present of God. But this assertion here’s what so many people Christians do. Why do you suppose we battle a lot with that disconnect between what we’ve obtained by grace from God, not solely salvation by Jesus Christ utilized by the Holy Spirit, however even all issues that we have now by widespread grace and but flip round with that mentality and inform different individuals it’s as much as you to earn your approach out of this.
Um: Yeah. Wow. Properly, I believe everyone knows the reply. I don’t know if we wish to admit it, however it’s self- righteousness. Now, that’s what it comes all the way down to. The rationale why we gravitate in the direction of that whilst Christians is of our self-righteousness. And it’s not a lot that we’re callous in the direction of others. However the purpose why we’re like that’s as a result of in the end we’re callous in the direction of God. We overlook what we’ve been saved from. We overlook what we’ve obtained. We overlook that what we have now has been given and never earned. It’s not by our personal competence or ourselves sufficiency or our know-how and our means to have the ability to troubleshoot.
And once more, it’s not that we haven’t labored laborious for these items, however God has given all of those advantages and blessings and privileges and alternatives and sources now in order that we’d have the ability to serve Him. So the implicit assumption that we have now is that every little thing that we have now is thru our competence and success. Though in fact, we’ll profess all of the presents that I’ve are from God, however functionally talking, we actually depend on our personal self-sufficiency. And I see this as a very large, laborious concern, particularly for these people who find themselves very gifted, very gifted and really assured and really realized and really well-trained. And so, we have now to maintain reminding ourselves that every little thing that we have now obtained has come from God and that we’re merely known as to not be house owners, as a result of we’re not house owners of any of our belongings, however that we’re stewards of what God has given to us and we’re known as to extend the grasp’s belongings and to disclaim self-sufficiency and to have the ability to mortify the self- righteousness by reminding ourselves of that stunning gospel of grace which we have now obtained by the completed work of Jesus.
Hansen:This subsequent query, Stephen, could construct off that final one. And as I used to be making ready for this interview and studying by our theological imaginative and prescient, I needed to essentially problem myself to not use theology to clarify away tough instructing, plain simple instructing. And naturally, that begins with the plain instructing of the Scriptures and of Jesus himself. I don’t wish to use theology and information in seminary and all that in my work to clarify away the plain which means of what Jesus is asking me to do. However that led me to a type of attention-grabbing and difficult place. You might have already had the type of seed of that reply in what you talked there about stewardship and the servants with the masters. However I’m simply questioning, logically talking, if wealth is an unmerited present from God, does that imply then I’ve a accountability for stewarding it effectively by saving and investing and even type of designated giving and issues like that. Or, if it’s a present that I don’t deserve, then is it simply one thing I’m purported to cross alongside as a present to others to bless them? How would you assist me suppose by that and the way do you do this in your individual church, which is characterised by what you simply described, lots of very gifted and profitable when it comes to the world group of individuals there in Boston.
Um: Properly, I believe once more, it is dependent upon the mindset of the person calling. So, if the particular person is pondering Christianly about his or her cash or materials possessions or monetary sources or monetary portfolio or no matter items that they’ve obtained from God from the angle of making an attempt to organize their very own future. And reasonably than pondering at it from the angle of, “Okay, God has given these things to me and I have a responsibility to make good heavenly investment and to be able to look at my money from a kingdom perspective.” And so once more, the Bible shouldn’t be anti-investment. The Bible shouldn’t be saying, “Oh, don’t invest.” After all, not. We see that with the parable in Luke 16 the place they had been purported to make good investments. We see that in Matthew 25 with the Parable of the Skills. Once more, we’re known as to maximise our grasp’s belongings.
And so, there’s a necessity for knowledge on this space the place we have now the human accountability to rightly steward what’s being given, however we have now to protect our hearts from over-saving or over-investing. So, I get lots of people from the church the place they’ll come to me and so they’ll say, “Hey, I’m not overspending. So I’m trying to manage the money that God has given to me.” After which I ask them questions on, “Are you over-saving because you’re insecure about what the future holds?” And so they’re like, “Yeah, I haven’t been generous to the church or the work of the kingdom, but I’m saving a lot.” And so, I believe that we might be grasping and have a self-centered approach of viewing cash both by overspending or over-saving. And so, we have now to ensure that we’re being beneficiant with what God has given to us, however not being anti-investment, however realizing that we have to make good investments from a heavenly kingdom oriented posture so that we are going to be good stewards of the funds that God has given to us as we save for the longer term and as we make investments for the longer term, whilst we assist those that are in want.
Hansen:Only a couple extra questions right here with Stephen Um. Let’s say, Stephen, that Jesus’s Spirit, we’re going to do a theological thought experiment that I utterly disagree with, however we’ll have a objective for it. Let’s say Jesus’s Spirit has ascended to heaven and he spoke to us from above. Because the Father did say at Jesus’ baptism, for instance, however he by no means bodily rose from the useless. What distinction would that make in our theology and dwelling?
Um: Properly, that’s not true.
Hansen:So hypothetical right here. Our assertion talks in regards to the necessity of the bodily resurrection, which I believe going again to the early a part of this dialog, we do nonetheless perpetuate a few of these dualistic mentalities that see a type of worth within the spirit, however not the physique. However I’m simply questioning, what distinction does it make that it’s a bodily resurrection?
Um: Yeah. Once more, the Bible doesn’t have a gnostic view of actuality. It’s not the spirit versus the physique, it’s each. And we have to be involved in regards to the materials issues on earth as a result of it’s God’s creation and our our bodies can be resurrected and completely renewed. Our our bodies matter, the fabric life issues as a result of within the new heavens and the brand new earth, there may be going to be an entire renovation of the issues that God has created with out sin. Once more, that isn’t to say, subsequently, that we don’t acknowledge the precedence of the soul and the way sinful sinners have to be redeemed by the blood of Christ, by his grace, by religion in Christ. Completely, we’re not minimizing that, however on the identical time, we have now to watch out that we don’t have a adverse view of that which God has created.
Hansen:I imply, let me simply press into that a bit of bit extra. We all know the Bible doesn’t have that view, I imply, what would make, I imply, simply think about a state of affairs the place Jesus’s lifeless physique is there, however you’ll be able to nearly like see his spirit ascending. Would it not make a distinction? Possibly I’m not asking an inappropriate query, however simply questioning theologically talking, would it not make any distinction?
Um: Properly, I imply, as Apostle Paul addresses in 1 Corinthians 15, now it provides us the promise of the bodily resurrection. And so, it doesn’t give us an image of a disembodied spirit. And so, subsequently, what we do right here on Earth as we stay on this fallen world as fallen creatures who’ve been redeemed by the blood of Jesus, that we don’t solely preoccupy ourselves with these issues that are religious, however we’re additionally known as, once more, the good commandment and given in Matthew 22 that we ought to like our neighbor reasonably than simply caring about, “Oh, when we get to the new heavens and new earth, then we’ll have great fellowship there, but we don’t have to be too concerned about what happens here.” Properly, what’s the church about? The church is a couple of assortment of fallen sinners who’ve been introduced along with Jesus being the top of that physique and we’re known as to like each other, to fellowship with each other, to wish for each other, to encourage each other, to rebuke each other. And so, we’re purported to be a life expression of that which God needed us to be right here on earth. And we haven’t been totally consummated and we can be totally, completely sanctified afterward. However once more, the Bible locations an emphasis on the significance of each the spirit and the physique.
Hansen:And definitely appears to be in step with the promise of the renewed, the brand new heavens and the earth, the promise that comes from Revelation 21 and 22 in success of so lots of these completely different Previous Testomony guarantees as effectively, together with of a type of a common resurrection to the judgment. Let’s simply shut it this fashion, you’ve written this examine information on mercy, actually working off these themes and also you’ve designed that for church buildings and for particular person Christians. How can we develop in our understanding or doing of mercy? Is there one observe that we might implement at present that will start to make a distinction in our perception and motion?
Um: Yeah. You understand, as we conclude right here, Collin, once more, I wanna say that the mission of the church is primarily to make disciples by proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ. And, however similtaneously the gospel is working itself in, into the hearts of sinful those who our lives are being modified and we wish to have the ability to be formed by that gospel after which we reply by loving neighbor. And I actually suppose that the Bible’s description of that loving your neighbor is basically the extra stunning image than what the tradition says about social justice as a result of the tradition says every little thing is social justice these days and through lately. And, so that you don’t know what social justice is as a result of every little thing is a justice concern now. However the Bible could be very clear about how we’re known as to like our neighbor. And the explanation why we’re known as to like our neighbor is as a result of our simply and righteous God is a loving God and He loves these individuals, particularly those that are in nice want.
And so, listed here are some sensible implications of how Christians and church buildings can develop in mercy. Reminding ourselves, mercy shouldn’t be non-obligatory for the Christian. It’s not non-obligatory. It’s not a luxurious. It’s a necessity for us to be merciful. And a sensible tip can be this, take a look at the human wants that you’ve round you. Generally we predict that we have to go to the inside metropolis or go to a unique a part of the world to have the ability to see actual human want. However take a look at the human wants that you’ve round you. There may be much more than you had been conscious of.
And God has positioned individuals in your life, household, church members, and neighbors, consider methods to fulfill their wants by your merciful deeds. And so, subsequently, know the neighborhood round you. You understand, we are saying like this, at city-to-city we are saying that we needs to be wanting on the concentric circles of concern. So, first is household, that’s your closest neighbor after which church and the broader neighborhood or your neighborhood. And so, we must always intensively and extensively give of ourselves making an attempt to fulfill different individuals’s must one of the best of our means and we ought to present generously even to those that don’t consider in Jesus Christ as a result of that’s a part of our witness to the world and it’s a response to the commandment that Jesus gave us in Matthew 22 and the good commandment. And regardless that our main accountability as a church is to make disciples by proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ, we’re additionally known as to obey lots of different instructions, that are very, crucial to us. And being merciful is a type of weightier issues of the regulation that we have to be involved about.
Hansen:For extra of this, you’ll be able to take a look at Gospel Formed Mercy, a small group video and e book examine revealed by TGC with The Good E-book Firm and written and introduced by Stephen Um, my visitor at present on “The Gospel Coalition Podcast.” Thanks, Stephen.
Um: My pleasure. Thanks.