Greg Lanier on Teaching 1 Corinthians (Part 2) https://chrisonet.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Greg-Lanier-on-Teaching-1-Corinthians-Part-2.jpg
SHARE


The next is an uncorrected transcript generated by a transcription service. Earlier than quoting in print, please verify the corresponding audio for accuracy.

Greg Lanier: Tongues, even listed below are nonetheless speaking about identified human languages. Despite the fact that typically it meant you type of squint your eyes and it doesn’t seem like it, however each time he will get to 2021 and so on, and the interpretation factor, it’s clearly nonetheless a language that folks know. What Paul is just attempting to do is say, “Don’t play the game of who’s got the better spiritual gift because that undermines the work of the gospel.”


Nancy Guthrie: Welcome to “Help Me Teach the Bible.” I’m Nancy Guthrie. “Help me Teach the Bible” is a manufacturing of the Gospel Coalition sponsored by Crossway a not for revenue writer of the ESV Bible Christian books and tracks. Be taught extra at crossway.org. That is half two of a dialog I started with Dr. Greg Lanier, on the ebook of First Corinthians. Dr. Lanier, you’ve helped us quite a bit with a whole lot of difficult subjects, however like now we’re attending to the actually exhausting stuff in First Corinthian, so we admire you sharing your knowledge with us on that.

Lanier: Yeah. I feel a gathering simply got here up and so…

Guthrie: You’ve received to go.

Lanier: …I gotta jet. Yeah, I gotta bounce. Sorry. No, it’ll be good.

Guthrie:Okay, good. We’re on First Corinthians chapter 11 and the heading is head coverings. So I feel by the truth that there are only a few folks in our circles who really cowl their head to go to church would say that we have now determined one thing about this passage. However maybe what’s most useful to us is for those who assist us perceive why perhaps we’ve landed there or, you understand…

Lanier: Or why some of us haven’t maybe.

Guthrie:Or why some of us haven’t. So assist us with this command concerning head overlaying.

Lanier: Yeah, certain. And simply, if of us are simply becoming a member of, to deliver them up to the mark, one of many issues I used to be attempting to articulate within the final installment is Paul is strolling his manner by way of a complete bunch of principally raging points within the Corinthian church. And what’s so instructive about that for us is that he offers us, for my part, type of a three-step course of. Step one is establish the core theological precept at play. Generally it’s Outdated Testomony stuff. Generally it’s the character of Jesus and so… In order that’s the 1st step and step… Step three… And I’ll come again to step two. Step three is what’s the precise factor he’s addressing and as an illustration, on this case it could be head coverings. It might be the person who has his father’s spouse. After which the center step, step two, is what does Paul instruct them to do in gentle of the theological basis? What does he say they need to do with this situation?

All three of these steps I feel are actually instructive for us as a result of we will diagnose our personal conditions with that very same grid. You bought a brand new situation pop up. The place do I am going within the Bible to deal with this? After which what am I gonna do with it? This one is form of, it’s a thorny passage clearly. The factor that makes it so difficult is that Paul is talking a few native scenario that’s international to us. You bought ladies shaving their heads. You may have some type of image of authority on their heads. He says one thing about lengthy hair is sweet for ladies. It’s her glory. It’s her overlaying. However lengthy hair for males is a shame. Okay, properly what does that about? So do I would like to cut off my man bond? No offense. You possibly can in all probability scratch that half.

And so we confronted these challenges. What precisely is he speaking about? And in order that’s the native situation. However what you discover as you learn by way of it’s that it’s really a really immensely theological passage. He goes again to in verse three, “the head of every man is Christ and the head of the wife is her husband and the head of Christ is God.”

Guthrie: There’s that theology, you had been telling us.

Lanier: Sure. He says okay, no matter I’m about to inform you I need it to circulation from this concept that the pinnacle of Christ, that God is the pinnacle, that God the daddy’s, the pinnacle of Christ, Christ is the pinnacle of the husband, the husband is the pinnacle of the spouse. And although he doesn’t quote it, he’s very clearly getting that from Genesis, Genesis one and two. He goes there and many different locations, actually, plenty of different thorny passages like First Timothy two. And so he’s drawing on creation language. He’s drawing on the orderliness that as a result of God is the God of order, that God has seen good, that it’s good to construction his creation this manner. Now, we could not like that, however we simply, that’s what Paul says. Chances are you’ll not like that, but it surely’s not me saying it. It’s Paul saying it, proper? So we have now to form of go there.

The following factor he says that’s associated is verse seven. “The husband or the man is the image and glory of God, but the woman is the glory of man.” That’s a thorny situation we will come again to. He’s nonetheless riffing on the identical factor. I feel in all probability most helpfully in verse 10, he says, “because of the angels.” And I feel he in all probability simply depart it there. I’m kidding. Yeah, that’s probably the most obscure issues that’s within the New Testomony. I feel there’s an angle on that. After which lastly, verse 16, verse 16 is a kind of nice, you understand, Paul is just not inclined to the nice and cozy fuzzies. We could not prefer it, however he says, look, if anybody’s inclined to be contentious, we have now no such observe.

Guthrie: Effectively, we don’t know anybody like that. Can we?

Lanier: No to the church of Christ. You possibly can complain about this, however okay, that is what we do. He’s not likely involved about whether or not you’d prefer it or not. So info don’t care about your emotions. Anyway. So he goes again to these two fundamental rules. His argument then is one thing like this… And as a type of normal caveat, I feel there might be reputable methods to reach at a distinct level. And so if somebody listening is in a sure camp the place perhaps they turned the knobs in a extra conservative route and so they wanna say, no, we really do suppose ladies ought to put on a scarf or one thing like that, I can utterly acknowledge there. I feel there’s a option to get there. I feel that is a kind of passages the place we have now to make use of some sanctified motive to form of make sense. So I’ll simply caveat it with that.

So what’s happening right here? What’s the native scenario? What seems to be happening is that you’ve got at Corinth as in the whole historical world, you may have a normal cultural observe the place ladies, particularly married or engaged ladies, lined their heads.

Guthrie:So it alerts one thing about their marital standing.

Lanier: Precisely. The truth is, in my little notes that I’ve a complete bunch of images. We’ve work, carvings from each Jewish and Greco Roman artifacts, pottery and that form of factor the place the ladies nearly all have a head overlaying. And, you understand, actually there’s one the place it has the mother and father taking a soon-to-be wed husband and spouse and the younger lady has a head overlaying, whereas a little bit lady wouldn’t. She wouldn’t cowl her head. And so there’s one thing in regards to the exhibiting of the pinnacle that alerts that you’ve got a specific social standing and significantly the standing with respect to your husband.

Okay. That’s not what we have now in most circles in say America or in England, what have you ever. However a whole lot of locations we nonetheless have that. And in reality, we have now a whole lot of worldwide college students right here at RTS who come from cultures the place that’s what they do. , just about the whole Center East does this, proper? Largely as a result of affect of Islam, however a few of it’s simply cultural. Like that is the way you present propriety. That is the way you present that you just’re a decent lady. It’s not a lot totally different than, you understand, once you go from being 15 years outdated as a man to perhaps make it much less contentious to being… Or let’s say you’re in highschool when you may get away with sporting, you understand, ripped up shorts and you understand, a band t-shirt, what have you ever, however once you present up first day at your new job in New York, except it’s Google, what you put on alerts a maturity.

So we nonetheless do that with clothes immediately. It’s all loopy and it modifications in a short time. However there’s nonetheless a way of propriety and decorum in terms of gown. So that truly continues to be one thing that we will have a bridge there. We’re listening to half the dialog as a result of we had been lacking a whole lot of the backwards and forwards that Paul has had with the church at Corinth. However what seems to be taking place right here at Corinth is there seems to be as a result of the ladies, not all of them, however a few of the ladies are shopping for into worldly pondering, shopping for into no matter the brand new mind-set is, no matter, nonetheless you present that you’re a liberated lady, this isn’t a brand new factor. This has occurred again then. We’ve a whole lot of historic proof for that. What they had been doing was both unshawling themselves and saying, “I’m not playing by your rules. I’m tearing down the patriarchy.” hashtag, you understand, no matter. Or in some circumstances perhaps even shaving their head to say, “We are visibly flaunting your authority, maybe even my own husband’s authority.” That may be a identified factor.

So Paul is particularly addressing that and that’s it. I feel there’s fairly clear that that’s what’s happening, that the ladies had been doing issues to the place the place they present that they’re underneath authority, specifically how they adorn their head to flaunt the authority. And so he says, that may’t be. He says principally don’t purchase it. Don’t purchase into that liberation is impulse as a result of the way you carry your self sends a message. It sends a message that you’re underneath the God ordained. What God has stated is a wholesome manner for marriage and maybe, you understand, the broader church to perform. You possibly can learn a passage like this and say, Paul is that this loopy misogynistic, he hates ladies. And the issue with that’s for those who flip a couple of chapters again in chapter seven when he offers with marriage and intercourse, he says one thing very profound. He says, males want to present their wives sexually what he owes to her as a result of she has authority over his physique. And he says, vice versa, ladies ought to give to their husbands what they owe to them sexually as a result of he has authority over her physique. You’ll count on all of those, this simply large, misogynistic, hateful individual to only say, “Husbands, you can do whatever you want to do to your wives.” The truth is, he leads with, “the wife has authority over her husband’s body.” The truth is, he makes use of the a phrase. He makes use of authority, which is mindblowing. That’s one place you may go to form of stability that out.

Mainly what he says is once you’re gathered for worship, once you’re praying or prophesying, the ladies have to cowl their heads. That’s his level. They should undertake the seen image of their posture that, “I am in a good way again. I am under the spiritual leadership of my husband and he is under the spiritual headship of Christ who is under the headship of the father.” And in order that’s the fundamental precept. And I’ll get to the form of conclusion. He says, take a look at, it’s improper for somebody to flaunt these items. After which he says, really in verse 14, “Doesn’t nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair, it’s a disgrace. But if a woman has long hair, it’s her glory, her hair is given to her for a covering.” That bit, “does not nature itself….” To me, that’s an fascinating form of foothold. The cultural conventions of our time within the type of mid-Roman period, time of life that he’s writing in, the best way we sign these items is hair size. And that’s why guys had brief hair and girls had lengthy hair and also you see all of the paintings that’s the way it all the time seems. That’s his level. It’s like you must gown or comport your self within the public gathering in a manner that respects that to point out that I’m a girl and in significantly a girl who’s married versus I’m a person and due to this fact I mustn’t reverse these sorts of issues.

If we [inaudible 00:11:19] all of it to 2019 central Florida and we stated, “Okay, Paul, we’ve read 1 Corinthians:11 therefore we all know that women have to have hair that’s at least 15 inches long and they all have to have a shawl,” I feel he’d say you’re loopy.

Guthrie:As a result of that doesn’t sign.

Lanier: That doesn’t imply something, proper? Apart from you’re in all probability form of backwards and bizarre. One of many issues I feel can change into a danger for us as we, significantly in America, learn scripture is we learn it by way of our personal cultural lens. However for those who go to East Africa, for those who go to Southeast Asia, the North is likely to be utterly totally different and positively, you understand, I spent a whole lot of time in Kenya talking inside sure tribes and so forth in sure components of a Kenyan tradition, ladies don’t usually perhaps not even have any hair or it’ll be actually brief and so it’d really be offensive. I imply, think about exporting a gospel, you parachute into South central Nairobi and say, “Okay, we want you to come to Jesus. What that means is all you ladies need to grow your hair out.” Like that might be insane. I feel Paul would say, “That makes no sense at all. You’ve completely missed what I’ve tried to say.” What he’s saying is no matter in your context alerts that you’re underneath the authority. And in reality, what it actually says there’s a spouse should have an authority on her head. It doesn’t even say image, it simply says an authority. No matter meaning… And once more, in Corinth that meant this, however it could be one thing totally different in Eire. It could be one thing totally different in Malaysia. I don’t know. Then do this to point out that you just respect the orderliness of God.

So it goes again to God finally, which raises the query of the angels as a result of I do know you’re going to ask me in regards to the angels. Should you take a look at each the Outdated Testomony and Jewish literature, angels are observing worship. They aren’t solely across the throne room of God, however they’re watching issues on earth. And also you get a style of this and the New Testomony as properly and likewise how we relate to angels.

Guthrie: Yeah. I take into consideration Peter speaking about salvation being a factor on which angels look.

Lanier: Yeah, precisely. And they also’re clearly concerned in what’s happening with God’s folks. And so essentially the most compelling option to form of take that a part of verse 10 is just not solely do you have to present this godly ordering of relationships, he says, “angels are watching.” I feel his argument is that if they appeared on and noticed us calling ourselves the church of God, however utterly overthrowing God’s created order, they’re gonna be impacted by that as properly. As a result of by the best way, they’ve already tried that or not less than a few of them, proper? They tried… Devil and his minions, they tried overthrowing the divine order and it didn’t go properly. And which really if you concentrate on that, that’s mindblowing that our worship has, at our little outdated church up in Lake Mary, has cosmic implications. And in reality, how we do it displays the very artistic rationale of God and the way that impacts angels.

Like that’s a reasonably spectacular manner to consider what’s happening in worship. I imply, if that’s the case, then by all means we must always conduct ourselves in a reverent manner. And so what that appears like everyday, I imply it depends upon the place you’re, however I feel most of us type of intuitively understand it’s nearly like we type of understand it after we see it that in our specific context. There’s sure cues that “nature” offers us to point out God, Christ, husband, spouse and that we’re submitting to God on this manner. However I don’t essentially wanna prescribe what that’s as a result of it’s gonna change.

Guthrie:Effectively, once you started in our first episode on First Corinthians and also you gave form of a press release about what First Corinthians about, you talked about it being a ebook of knowledge on figuring out these items. And he’s making use of it to many alternative issues. Nevertheless it appears to me maybe the largest problem of the knowledge he’s presenting right here by way of the best way it goes in opposition to our modern-day tradition is, you understand, we simply get this message of you gotta be you and, you understand, don’t attempt to please different folks. You simply have to specific your self. This appears to me to be a message to us to be, no, you have to be contemplating how some methods you current your self, the way it impacts the bigger physique of Christ and even angels, that you’re sending some alerts about your willingness to undergo Christ in many alternative methods and truly you do have to be acutely aware about the way you come throughout. Is that taking it too far?

Lanier: I feel that’s proper. I imply one other manner you may perhaps phrase it, every of those points that Paul is addressing entails different folks. And Paul is saying the work of Christ is not only about you. That I feel is among the key insights that we have now imbibed in an more and more individualistic period. This isn’t new. I imply we’ve overly individualized the gospels and say it’s nearly me strolling, me providing the prayer and getting proper with God. You don’t discover that in any respect in First Corinthians. What you discover is a profound otherness that the entire ethics, the entire occupied with how we reside and the work of Jesus type of flowing by way of is profoundly about different folks and the way we present like to different folks with how I’m appearing.

Paul’s imaginative and prescient and the entire Bible’s imaginative and prescient of the church is what occurs to me impacts you. What occurs to you once you’re doing properly with the Lord or once you’re not doing properly with the Lord impacts me, that we’re not on an Island. I’m not doing properly except you’re doing properly. Listening to about your religion makes me really feel, makes me [inaudible 00:16:472]. However what turns into fascinating about First Corinthians is how as he’s making use of scriptural reality and the work of Jesus to those points, he’s all the time directing us in direction of loving these with whom we share this oneness in Christ. And in order that I feel is a key factor as you’re working by way of it with a gaggle, is to always say, “Okay, how can we love you? How does this help us love each other better?” Why is combating in opposition to my very own sin and even church self-discipline? Nobody likes speaking about it. I do know it’s exhausting. Even that’s really deeply about how that dynamic of unchecked sin impacts all of us.

Guthrie:Effectively, let’s bounce to 12, 13 and 14.

Lanier: Okay. If we should.

Guthrie:Don’t act so enthusiastic about it Greg.

Lanier: No, no. It’s fascinating…

Guthrie:The explanation I…

Lanier: …but it surely’s exhausting.

Guthrie:…perceive as a result of it’s exhausting and since you and I each acknowledge that we’ll have listeners to this podcast who see a whole lot of these items very in another way. And so perhaps we will’t anticipate that we’re gonna first please everyone or cowl it as broadly or deeply as some may like, however let’s simply do our greatest to supply some helps for these of us who we’re occupied with educating this and we’ve received to determine, “Wow, how am I gonna present this in my church, in my denomination?” Perhaps even suppose these methods. So I’m wondering if a great way to begin is likely to be just a few definition of phrases. Would you give me a definition to begin with, only for religious presents then perhaps give me one for prophecy and provides me one for tongues.

Lanier: Okay. If I needed to decide a piece within the New Testomony, to not get myself in hassle, however I’m not within the camp of like I’ve a 100% certainty about each single factor. If I needed to decide a piece within the New Testomony the place I’ve essentially the most open questions, it’s in all probability this one.

Guthrie:Okay. I feel that’s useful for us as academics to know. Somebody who’s immersed in Greek and New Testomony, that if we’re battling this and we really feel like, “I’m not sure I can come down and say, this is what it’s clearly teaching,” that we in all probability have a whole lot of good firm.

Lanier: Yeah. It doesn’t imply that I need to say nothing about it, but it surely means not less than I’m attempting to be…[crosstalk 00:18:56]

Guthrie:Humble. You’re a little bit humble about your conclusions, proper?

Lanier: I can see how folks can come to a distinct place and I don’t should vilify them and in some way shedding the gospel or one thing like that. And so even simply modeling that and even saying, “Look, I don’t have all the answers here. I think there are some things that are clear. I think there’s some things that aren’t clear and that gives us some space to agree to disagree and still go to the potluck afterwards, right?”

Guthrie:In order that feels like one method for academics as you method this, what is obvious and to perhaps main on these issues and tread calmly the place it’s much less clear?

Lanier: That will be my method. Yeah. I imply there are some who need to all the time have 100% sure about the whole lot. That’s not me. I want [inaudible 00:19:38] Anyway, by way of the definition, religious presents, it comes from charisma.

Guthrie:Is a religious present one thing I’m good at naturally or is it one thing I’m solely good at it due to some supernatural provision like [crosstalk 00:19:52]

Guthrie:Yeah, and it’s really higher than the identify. I imply, religious present is the English option to seize it, but it surely’s really simply present. Everytime you see that, it’s only a sure noun for present. It already tells you one thing, that it’s not pure to you. You weren’t born with it, proper? So you possibly can’t boast in it. It was given to you. So as a result of it’s a present, it comes from outdoors of you. The phrase pertains to the type of cluster of phrases associated to grace and present, and so it’s one thing that has been graced to you by God. Not essentially innate. It’s not even essentially one thing you want. I imply you don’t like all of your presents.

Guthrie:We don’t get to decide on them.

Lanier: Yeah. You don’t get to decide on them. It is probably not your favourite factor to do. , a whole lot of of us who’ve the present of hospitality, it wears them out and so they hate cleansing up afterwards, proper? And so it doesn’t imply you shouldn’t use the present simply because it’s a wrestle for you. And so it’s one thing given by God by way of the Holy Spirit. You’ll go to love Ephesians 4 for that. And so it’s not only a talent or a expertise. The opposite factor that he makes clear right here, particularly in chapter 12, there’s a selection that’s one key however the identical spirit. So it’s one God however quite a lot of presents. After which he says, “Each Christian” verse seven, “to ‘each is given a manifestation of the spirit,” which is a elaborate manner of sending a religious present. And spot he says, “for the common good.” And so the opposite factor you have to take into consideration by way of defining what a religious present is, it’s not simply one thing you do by yourself in isolation. As we talked about only a second in the past, it’s deeply different oriented. The entire level of the present is for it to bless another person.

Guthrie: That it’s fruitful within the physique of Christ to additional God’s kingdom. Would that be a option to say it?

Lanier: Yeah, precisely. And to construct up the physique, you understand, it say that elsewhere it’s to edify and encourage others. And so even when he does outline a present that manner, that already removes some issues off the desk, removes the concept that tongues, and I’ll outline them in a minute, that tongues are nearly you and God as a result of presents don’t perform that manner. They’re nearly not about that.

Guthrie: So that you’re saying to speak about tongues as a non-public prayer language is likely to be off the desk.

Lanier: Yeah. So that you the concept that a tongue is type of this ecstatic, and I don’t imply this in a pejorative manner, however type of incoherent. It’s not a identified language. It’s simply your personal prayer language with God. And to name that the religious present would really be in opposition to what Paul is speaking about. With out impugning that phenomenon, it definitely wouldn’t match the invoice in what he’s describing. If there are tongues and we’ll come to that, they should be for the aim of blessing others. It’s not simply your personal personal factor. In order that’s in all probability the very first thing or the an enormous factor by way of defining presents.

Guthrie:Perhaps earlier than we go on to defining prophecy…

Lanier: Certain, yeah.

Guthrie:…or extra on tongues, perhaps you must give us a way for, you understand, chapter 13, we have now all the time heard it alone and we consider it primarily as, you understand, one thing that’s learn at a marriage that that is about love and relationship between a person and a girl and even simply us loving the physique. However what’s its context within the midst of this dialog about religious presents after which prophecy and tongues? How can we after we’re educating 1 Corinthians:13 what’s the important thing to getting it proper by way of it’s context?

Lanier: Yeah. Yeah. I imply in a single hand, it’s type of just like the Ruth passage, like wherever you go I’ll go. And it’s, like, don’t learn that at weddings. So like, wow.

Guthrie: However there was one thing there about dedication, proper?

Lanier: Yeah. I imply it’s good and it performs properly. It’s like I don’t wanna utterly rain on folks’s parades. I wouldn’t say… The truth is at a marriage I’m doing developing, [inaudible 00:23:14]

Guthrie: Are you gonna learn it?

Lanier: [inaudible 00:23:15]

Guthrie: Okay.

Lanier: Some hills you don’t die on. However is it the very best use of it? Perhaps not. , verse one really makes it fairly clear what it’s about. In lots of respects, the intrusion of the large quantity 13 and the verse primary is, you understand, definitely later it was added later. And so from Paul’s perspective, he in all probability wouldn’t have seen an enormous break there. From presents and tongues, straight into extra about presents and tongues, about talking in tongues of males and angels and haven’t love.

So although it sort of feels like this love poem, it really has a vital level. In lots of respects, chapter 13 is the important thing to chapter 12 and 14. What they’re messing up at Corinth which in all probability goes all the best way again to the prior dialogue in chapters one, two and three about how they’re shopping for into worldliness and worldly pondering is that they’re in impact competing over visitors. They’re saying, this individual has a greater present than this individual. This individual speaks in tongues, however this individual simply does this and you understand, retains the nursery or what have you ever. And he’s saying, look, even when I spoke within the tongues of males, even when I had an angelic tongue… He’s not saying that they exist. He’s saying, “even if I did that, but I don’t have love, if I’m doing it selfishly, if I’m doing it, showing off, if I’m doing it as a sense of one-upsmanship or I’m a higher ranking member of my local church or what have you, but I have not love then I’m just making noise.” That’s his level. With out love, love, within the Bible is an different love, if I’m not loving others in my train of those presents, then I’m doing it improper. That’s what chapter 13 is about. So it really matches fairly properly in his technique right here.

Prophecy, now this can be a large [crosstalk 00:24:54]

Guthrie:Yeah. Let’s learn 14 verse one. ”Pursue love and earnestly want the religious presents, particularly that you could be prophesy.” He’s telling us to want it. So I suppose we have to know what it’s.

Lanier: Yeah. What’s prophecy? That may be a essential query. There’s principally two faculties of thought. It’s very straightforward to get down within the weeds. And there’s a whole lot of ink that has been spilled, a whole lot of pleasant fireplace that comes with this query. One possibility is it’s prophecy type of because the Outdated Testomony prophets did it. That’s God is straight talking by way of you. It’s new info from God that has some form of binding high quality that we must always hearken to and we must always put into observe. So one in every of you, the concept is that in some way in some respects that’s persevering with.

Guthrie:And can be infallible. Would that be the best phrase to explain it?

Lanier: Relying on who you requested.

Guthrie:Proper. Okay.

Lanier: It depends upon who you ask. Perhaps it’s simply type of the center floor. In order that’s one excessive place that’s primarily the identical fundamental factor that Isaiah was doing. The type of reverse conclusion is it’s principally preaching. And what I imply by that’s for those who take a look at what the prophets really do, other than a smidgen right here and there the place they’re forecasting and for lack of a greater time period, what’s about to occur, which they do do this, the overwhelming majority of what they had been is simply good outdated, not good outdated Baptist hell, and brimstone preachers. What are they doing? They’re preaching Deuteronomy. They’re going to Hezekiah. They’re going to them and so they’re saying, “Look…

Guthrie:And so they’re drawing out the implications.

Lanier: Precisely. It’s nearly like they’re merely simply expositing the Torah. That’s what the prophets primarily did. And so really the concept of prophecyings immediately means Nostradamus, proper? You’re making predictions about who’s going to win the soccer sport. That’s really by and enormous, not what the Outdated Testomony prophets had been doing, not less than as their major job description. Did they look ahead to captivity and exile within the Messiah? Sure. However that wasn’t the bread and butter of what they had been doing. They they had been good outdated gospel preachers within the Outdated Testomony. So the opposite view of prophecy not less than as [inaudible 00:26:55] you’re gonna hear is that it’s one thing like that. It’s you’re proclaiming the phrase of God, making use of it to his folks and that that’s the essence of prophecy.

After which there’s form of a center floor, which is type of, for those who’re conscious there’s this Calvinistic continuation is to motion the place of us are reformed broadly however consider in sure sorts of ongoing particular religious presents. And in order that camp usually says, “Look, there is this newness of prophetic reception from God, that I am receiving a message from God, but it’s not necessarily binding. I’m not necessarily saying thus sayeth the Lord.” That’s form of a center place. You’re gonna have to speak to your pastor, you’re gonna should do some studying to form of determine the place you’re gonna land as a result of the phrase doesn’t inform you. It’s a must to herald a whole lot of different theology in phrases…

Guthrie:Are there any sources you’ll level us to as we’re attempting to know the totally different positions?

Lanier: Certain. Yeah. I imply, I feel there really is a 3 views or 4 views on the, this type of exercise has stopped camp. I’ve all the time appreciated Richard Gaffigan’s views on Pentecost. It offers with tongues. It offers with this as properly. However for those who wanna method it from a distinct perspective and get their arguments, you understand, Wayne Grudem is among the key figures and the discussions of the form of center place. Sam Storms as properly, who’s form of broadly in a reformed camp. And there’s in all probability some others [crosstalk 00:28:17]

Guthrie: These are all very useful.

Lanier: Not that I’m essentially commending them, however that’s the place you may go to get the form of the very best [crosstalk 00:28:21]

Guthrie: To listen to their view.

Lanier: …of that place. So, and go to your pastor and say, “What do you think about this?” Regardless of the prophesying is… And I do lean within the route that it’s a declaration of what God has already stated versus some new revealing of what God has stated. He says that’s extra essential, that form of proclamation. And he explains why. “For the one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God for no one understands him.” Now, that will make it appear to be it’s some type of ecstatic language that has no actual intelligibility.

He goes on to explain how the rationale why it’s unintelligible is that it’s not in a language that you understand. , for those who began talking in Mandarin, I wouldn’t perceive you. This level right here is that prophesying is intelligible to everybody whereas tongues is probably not. In verse three perhaps that is in all probability the very best place to configure what he’s getting at. “The one who prophesies speaks to people for their upbuilding and encouragement and constellation.” So once more, the present is for different. Tongues are so divisive, similar to baptism is. And, you understand, these are in all probability the 2 issues that we divide on essentially the most on this type of fashionable broadly evangelical world. Should you take a look at Acts, it’s I feel 100% clear that it’s an intelligible language that you just didn’t naturally study.

Guthrie: Since you had all these folks from everywhere in the world who had been there for that feast of Pentecost.

Lanier: Proper. And in a while with [inaudible 00:29:41] and…

Guthrie:And so they’re listening to the gospel in their very own language.

Lanier: Precisely. I imply it says… Two issues give it away. Effectively first the phrase means dialect. I imply it means your bodily tongue or it means the form of precise identified linguistic dialect. In order that’s even the phrase type of suggestions it’s hand. Second, you may have the verb that’s used is a phrase that’s solely used for intelligible speech. The truth is, so you may have them the tongues of fireplace come down. All of them ”communicate in tongues.” That phrase for communicate is just not the conventional phrase for communicate. It’s form of a elaborate phrase. And a few verses later is the very same phrase that’s used when Peter stands up and begins talking. And so it’s clearly clever language. And the third factor is all of them hear the language that they know, however these largely Galilean Jewish background guys shouldn’t have identified Persian or no matter.

So Acts is 100% clear that the tongues are intelligible language. First Corinthians 14 seems to be the fly within the ointment the place as I discussed in verse two, “you’re speaking not to men but to God.” This concept that the tongue is simply speech that’s not intelligible in verse eight, like a view of giving an vague sound. Verse 9, for those who’re together with your tongue, you utter speech that’s not intelligible and so forth. So a whole lot of of us take a look at that and say, okay, that is some type of angel language. It’s a heavenly language. It’s not an actual human language and it’s simply syllables can catenate it collectively. And that’s what I do once I communicate in tongues. And I’ve been in church buildings the place that occurs. And once I was abroad in Auckland and I used to be at a…I didn’t know, I don’t even know what these phrases meant. I used to be younger. However I used to be at a what I later discovered was a Pentecostal church and so they began doing these items. I used to be like, “What on earth is going on?” It was very surprising to me. And so I used to be really within the place of the man in verse 21 outsiders coming in and I’ve skilled, I used to be like, “What on earth is going on? These people are crazy,” proper? At the very least that’s what I as an outsider felt.

And so the best way I take a look at verse or chapter 14 to form of, okay, are tongues particular charismatic angel languages or are are they precise human languages? Paul goes to, as he has again and again in First Corinthians, he goes to type of rock stable reality. The best way he explains all that is in verse 21. He says, “in the law…” By the best way, it’s fascinating as a result of it’s really Isaiah, ”It’s written by the folks of unusual tongues and by the lips of foreigners, will I communicate to this folks and even then they won’t hearken to me.” After which he says, ”thus tongues are an indication not for believers, however for unbelievers, whereas prophecy is assigned not for unbelievers however for believers.” All of it appears very convoluted. What he’s saying is that this primarily based on tongues, in accordance with Isaiah tongues in accordance with the phrase of God, this talking international identified languages such because the language of the Babylonians once they roll into city. Talking a international language is definitely an eschatological signal of judgment. It’s saying that gospels, the message is being proclaimed to the folks of God by a international language and so they’re not listening.

So the judgment is available in, you hear a international language and also you don’t perceive. And that’s why Pentecost is so highly effective as a result of they hear the international language and so they do perceive and that’s how they hear the gospel. So his level is, the rationale why he’s saying tongues as an intelligible language are usually not almost as essential as prophecy, is that they change into an indication of judgment on the one who can’t perceive them, not a useful factor. And in reality, unbelievers are available in and so they see this and it turns into a form of an inaccessible factor that they due to this fact type of stands in judgment over. And he says, so due to this fact, for those who’re gonna communicate in a tongue, it has been translated. Simply talking in a tongue does no good for anybody. It needs to be made intelligible, in any other case it brings judgment on the one who can’t reply to it. So he goes to Isaiah to form of show that out.

So it’s difficult. So no doubts you possibly can simply in a hour-long Bible examine on Thursday morning and get utterly caught within the mud. And so if I had been attempting to strategically make my manner by way of this, I feel what you steered, defining these phrases, attempting to border that tongues, even right here, are nonetheless speaking about identified human languages, although typically it makes you type of squint your eyes and doesn’t seem like it, however each time he will get to 2021 et cetera, and the interpretation factor, it’s clearly nonetheless a language that folks know. What Paul is just attempting to do is say, “Don’t play the game of who’s got the better spiritual gift, because that undermines the work of the gospel.”

Guthrie:So we get to chapter 15, and I’ve to inform you, wow, this chapter is so essential. That is essential for us going through life and demise. And as I take into consideration this chapter, I take into consideration how most of my life, I assumed the trajectory of the Christian life was, I select Christ now change into a Christian, then I am going to heaven once I die.

Lanier: Proper. You in all probability would change into an angel.

Guthrie: And I feel…That may’ve been in there. However definitely, you understand, I didn’t perceive a resurrected and renewed earth. And clearly by way of most of my Christian life, I by no means gave a thought to how is my everlasting existence after I come again with Christ and he calls my physique from the grave and I change into united as soon as once more, physique and soul? However now in a resurrected glorified physique like Christ, how is that existence going to be totally different than what we’d name theologically the intermediate state or the best way Paul describes it in Second Corinthians, away from the physique…

Lanier: However with Christ.

Guthrie:…at dwelling with the Lord? However I feel many individuals have simply not thought by way of this.

Lanier: Certain. Effectively, it’s difficult.

Guthrie: And I might assume nonetheless, once you get to first Corinthians, you’re as a instructor, introduced with this unimaginable alternative to make these items clear.

Lanier: I imply, on this, you understand, nearly 60 verses you’re like, “How could I even cover this?” Proper. And so it’s nearly an excessive amount of good to cowl. And so simply to form of provide the excessive degree tackle it, the primary 20 verses or so, he’s arguing for the theological necessity of the resurrection and it’s only a stunning… He begins by quoting this apostolic custom of what’s the essence of the gospel and the resurrection is entrance and heart. “If there is no resurrection we should pack it up and go home.” So he begins there as a result of apparently the Corinthians, due to no matter worldly philosophy that bear some resemblance to love Platonism that the physique is dangerous, soul is sweet and we don’t know precisely what they had been shopping for into, however regardless of the case they had been denying the resurrected physique, in some way physique is, that’s simply new ages and immediately. There’s no, with no resurrection of the physique of Christ, we’re simply, we’d as properly simply go dwelling. Let’s simply pack it up. So he begins there.

After which he shifts to the query of, okay, if the resurrection is true as a result of it occurred to Jesus, what’s it gonna seem like? He requested the query with what sort of physique am I gonna be raised in? Which, I imply, my children requested that query. “Are we gonna have candy in heaven, random ice cream in heaven?” and so forth. And it’s form of exhausting to reply that with out you simply type of utterly ruining all their hopes, however giving them a greater hope. So he says in verse 35, somebody will ask, how are the lifeless raised with what sort of physique do they arrive? And so what he then does simply blows everybody’s thoughts, proper? And it’s extraordinarily difficult and, however in a great way. What he principally does in my studying is he’s attempting to explain the indescribable. I imply, how do you describe the resurrected physique? Nobody’s skilled it, however one individual. And what can we get within the gospels after we see them expertise the risen Lord? It doesn’t fairly match our classes. I imply he can withhold data of who he’s and so they mistake him for folks. They don’t know.

Guthrie:However he eats.

Lanier: However he eats however he can simply present up locations after which he’d go, it’s like, “Where is he?” And he went as much as heaven and it’s, “Where is he?” And so already it stretches any skill for us to even think about what’s getting at. And so what Paul I feel is attempting to do is say, “I’m gonna do my best to give you a taste of what the body is. But what I wanna do is emphasize that it is a body. You’re not just an energy force field floating around. You’re not even an angel because angels don’t have bodies. You actually have a body.” As a result of theologically it’s actually essential that he had a physique and he’s the primary resurrected. And as soon as all that hangs collectively once more, theology is the idea for what he’s doing right here.

And he offers, in my manner of type of slicing and dicing it, he offers principally three footage, attempt to describe what it’s gonna seem like. The primary one is that this seed plant analogy, which is my favourite one. It’s the best to know. What he primarily says is he says, “your body is like the seed you plant in the dirt,” which I imply, that’s a really good metaphor. The physique happening to die. He says that seed has, for those who take a look at, so let’s say, you understand, my children plant seeds and we develop stuff and so they normally die in a few days. You decide a single seed and also you plant it and it grows right into a plant and will you say, “Okay, that final plant is that same plant as the seed?” And the reply to that’s sure. I imply there’s an important integrity between these two. It didn’t come from another seed. It got here from that particular seed.

And so the seed analogy says, look, there’s continuity between what goes into the earth and what comes out of it that you’re the identical individual. You’re the identical being, so to talk.

Guthrie: So once I…

Lanier: So what modifications is you may have the breakdown of the one and the total completion when it emerges. And I exploit in school… You take a look at the silk Sequoia tree being one of many greatest that exists. It comes from this microscopic little seed. And so it’s the identical Sequoia, but it surely’s been simply utterly reworked. So it’s the identical factor, but it surely’s gone from much less to nice and in a manner that he can’t even clarify. In order that’s his first image.

Guthrie:By some means in a manner that we will’t think about. God goes to take this mud. He’s gonna collect up the mud of our physique, whether or not it was planted within the floor or unfold within the sea, and it’s gonna be our DNA. And he’s gonna collect from that and he’s going to in some way style from {that a} wonderful physique, like Christ physique, that’s match to reside ceaselessly.

Lanier: That’s an attractive analogy. The following one is that this heaven and earth analogy. And he says, okay, there’s heavenly our bodies and there’s earthly our bodies. And it’s a little bit of an advanced analogy, however you’re gonna go from flesh and earthiness, which nonetheless has a form of glory as a result of he stated elsewhere in First Corinthians, you may have the glory of God in you, but it surely’s gonna be even higher. You’re gonna be reworked on this manner that he sorta simply takes us to [inaudible 00:40:09] after which leaves it there. After which the ultimate, he goes from first Adam to final,Adam, so authentic Adam to Jesus. And he says, look, the primary Adam was from the mud, he was from the earth. He was stuffed with a soul, however he was simply, he was clearly lower than what the second Adam was.

And so then on the type of turning level late within the passage he smashes all these collectively and he type of takes the seed analogy and he says, “Look, you were sewn perishable dust, glorious but still earthy and you’re gonna be raised,” switching the imagery, “to resurrection inperishable, glorious,” and so forth. And he type of leaves it there. And so what I inform my children, like, you understand, the Bible tells us quite a bit about what the resurrected state is gonna be like, however doesn’t inform us all the main points. I don’t know if [crosstalk 00:40:55]

Guthrie: It doesn’t reply all of the questions we want answered.

Lanier: I don’t know if I’m gonna be taller, handsomer. I don’t know if we’re gonna have ice cream. I don’t know. That wasn’t Paul’s level as a result of he’s describing the indescribable. However no matter it’s, it’s not simply, you understand, Nancy received by way of 2.zero it’s one thing far past what you possibly can even think about. I feel actually, particularly when you have a gaggle of parents that you just’re educating this to, one alternative is you possibly can take care of a few of the actual key points we’re going through day by way of incapacity, by way of the dignity of people who find themselves born with genetic or other forms of brokenness. As a result of many individuals, they’ve this concept of what regular is, what functioning is. After which they are saying, “Okay, the resurrected body is just sort of a more tweaked, fitter, happier, more like Brad Pitt version of that.” And that’s by no means what Paul is saying. He says, look, what you are actually, and no matter God has put in your life is simply the seed. We don’t know what we’re actually gonna be like. However that type of ranges the enjoying area as a result of I feel the oldsters who take care of continual illness or, you understand congenital issues may be very damage by the concept that I’m regular. That individual’s not regular. The resurrected physique is simply gonna be regular. It’s like, nope, none of us are regular. We’re all flesh. We’re all mud. Simply a few of us is extra visibly damaged than others and all of us are gonna be reworked.

In order that type of cuts by way of the query of like, “okay, how old will I be in my resurrected body? Will I still have this?” Like none of that’s actually on the desk as a result of you don’t have any thought what you’re gonna be. You’re gonna be conformed to the picture of Christ and perfected in a manner that we don’t even have an analogy for immediately. So I feel it’s a greater place to take it as a result of there’s a whole lot of freight that will get dropped at it. And type of finding out afresh and that may assist take care of that. So…

Guthrie:Effectively, Greg, why don’t we shut this manner, after we’ve completed educating by way of the ebook of First Corinthians to whoever we’re educating it to, what can we hope the influence has been on these we’ve taught?

Lanier: In some respects there’s gonna be chapters that aren’t straightforward discussions and folks will probably be offended and you must take, you must type of do some digging. And so the entire form of moral, ethical points and girls and people sorts of issues are, they’re loaded subjects. And so that you don’t wanna essentially land there in some large argument about head coverings. Maybe the good factor is that other than the concluding chapter, the thrust of First Corinthians lands within the resurrected physique. And so for those who wanna type of wrap all of it up, that’s a reasonably good place to land, which by the best way, it goes again to the start, Christ is the one who’s enough for all of our wants as a result of even the First Corinthians 15 by the best way, it looks like a little bit of a barely random rhapsodic, you understand, type of stunning factor in regards to the resurrected physique. It’s really coping with a difficulty. They’re denying the resurrection and in the event that they’re denying the resurrection and the significance of the physique, then why not go have a prophecy, proper? So it’s really a really pastoral situation he’s coping with, however he lands on this, the glory that we’re heading in direction of.

And in order that’s a pleasant ultimate conclusion to your First Corinthians Bible examine. Land there, the place’s the sting of demise? As you’re discipling folks by way of this letter and all of its complexity, the thrust as we’ve talked about is drawing us collectively in unity. And so the gorgeous factor in regards to the resurrection chapter and the place it ends is that even in our present struggling demise throughout us the perishability that all of us face and no matter struggling any individual is bringing to that bible examine the place you land is celebrating that we collectively are heading to a specific place, that victory is gonna swallow up no matter struggling with united to Christ that is our nice hope in order that we will sing collectively even within the midst of struggling.

Guthrie: Effectively, Dr. Lanier, thanks a lot for serving to us educate First Corinthians.

Lanier: You’re welcome.

Guthrie:You’ve been listening to ”Assist me Train the Bible” with Nancy Guthrie, a manufacturing of the Gospel Coalition sponsored by Crossway. Crossway is a not for revenue writer of the ESV Bible Christian Guide and Tracks. Be taught extra about Crossways gospel centered-resources at crossways org.

SHARE

Leave a Reply