᛫  

The FAQs: What You Should Know About Late-Term Abortion

What just happened?

Recent events have brought the issue of late-term abortion back into the news, and into the realm of presidential politics. On Tuesday, during his 2020 State of the Union address, President Trump called on members of Congress to pass legislation finally banning the late-term abortion of babies.

The next day, on the talk show The View, Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg was asked to elaborate on his support for late-term abortion. Co-host Meghan McCain said, I think the interpretation from pro-life people like me was that you meant a baby actually being born . . . I just wanted you to clarify, because I found that statement to be pretty radical. In response Buttigieg replied,

Im just pointing to the fact that different people will interpret their own moral lights, and for that matter interpret Scripture, differently. But we live in a country where it is extremely important that no one person should have to be subject to some other persons interpretation of their own religion. . . .

What are late-term abortions?

The definition of what is considered late-term is controversial within the abortion debate. Pro-lifers generally use the term to refer to any time after the fetal viability, when the child could possibly survive outside the womb. This is usually around 21 weeks, or the last half of the second trimester of pregnancy.

In contrast, abortion supporters usually say that late-term only after 27 weeks, when the chance of viability is more than 90 percent. Some more radical claims, such as by The New York Times health reporter Pam Belluck, contend that the term should only be applied to pregnancies that extend past a womans due date, meaning about 41 or 42 weeks.

Isnt late-term abortion illegal? Wasnt a ban on the procedure already put in place years ago?

In 2003, Congress passed and President Bush signed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. The act defined a partial-birth abortion as any abortion in which the death of the fetus occurs when the entire fetal head . . . or . . . any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother. That law was challenged in the 2007 case of Gonzales v. Carhart.The Supreme Court ruled that the particular procedure could be banned because it did not interfere with a womans right to an abortion.

While there remains a ban on that partial-birth abortion procedure, it does not affect the timing of an abortion, nor does it override or nullify the health exception that was established in the Supreme Courts ruling in Doe v. Bolton (1973)

What is the health exception?

The Supreme Courts opinion inDoev. Bolton stated that a woman may obtain an abortion even after viability if necessary to protect her health. The Court defined health as follows:

Whether, in the words of the Georgia statute, an abortion is necessary is a professional judgment that the Georgia physician will be called upon to make routinely. We agree with the District Court, 319 F. Supp., at 1058, that the medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factorsphysical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the womans agerelevant to the well-being of the patient. All these factors may relate to health.

In 1992, the Supreme Court reaffirmedRoein the case ofPlanned Parenthood of Southern Pennsylvania v. Casey.The ruling replaced the trimester formula inRoewith an emphasis on viability:

Before viability, the States interests are not strong enough to support a prohibition of abortion or the imposition of a substantial obstacle to the womans effective right to elect the procedure. Second is a confirmation of the States power to restrict abortions after fetal viability, if the law contains exceptions for pregnancies which endanger the womans life or health.

By claiming that theessential holding ofRoe v. Wadeshould be retained and once again reaffirmed, the Court was claiming that the same standard of health applied as before.

As the pro-abortionGuttmacher Institute notes, inRoe,Doe, andCaseythe Court has held that:

  • even after fetal viability, states may not prohibit abortions necessary to preserve the life or health of the woman;
  • health in this context includes physical and mental health;
  • only the physician, in the course of evaluating the specific circumstances of an individual case, can define what constitutes health and when a fetus is viable; and
  • states may not require additional physicians to confirm the attending physicians judgment that the womans life or health is at risk in cases of medical emergency.

In other words, if a physician determines that the child is non-viable and/or the abortion is necessary for the physicalormentalhealth of the mother, a woman can have an abortion from the moment of conception until the childs natural birth.

Arent late-term abortions rare in the United States?

According to theCenters for Disease Control, approximately 1.3 percent of abortions in 2015 occurred after 21 weeks gestation (that was the last year for which complete statistics are available). Based on this rate, and a reported 638,169 abortions that year, we can estimate that the number of late-term abortions was 8,296.

If late-term abortions were separated from earlier abortions, they would be the leading cause of death for children younger than 1 year old.

Arent most late-term abortions conducted to save the life of the mother?

No. In fact, the question of whether abortion is ever necessary after viability to save the pregnant womans life is a point of debate within the medical community. Yet even if it is sometimes necessary, saving the life of the mother is rarely even mentioned as the reason late-term abortions are conducted. As even the pro-abortionGuttmacher Institute admitsthat data suggest that most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.

According to a2013 study, most women seeking a later abortion fit at least one of five profiles: they were raising children alone, were depressed or using illicit substances, were in conflict with a male partner or experiencing domestic violence, had trouble deciding and then had access problems, or were young and had never given birth before.

One abortionist said in an interview that some women have a late-term abortion because they were unaware they were pregnant until after the fetus became viable:

They have no idea theyre in their 24th week. So they make an appointment for an abortion, and it takes a few weeks, and they have their ultrasound and find out that theyre at 27 weeks, which is too far for an abortion anywhere. So then what happens? They either give up or have a baby, or they go on the Internet and they find us.

Additionally, because the health standard includes psychological factors, almost any reason for a late-term abortion can be justified by an abortionist. As Phill Kline, the former attorney general of Kansas, has pointed out, the late-term abortionist George Tiller frequently used the health exception to justify post-viability abortions.

Tillers files included such reasons for late-term abortions as a desire to go to prom and another to avoid hiring a babysitter while attending rock concerts. To each of these conditions, Tiller assigned a mental health diagnosis of adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, or single episodic severe depression. Tiller considered all of these mental conditions to be permanent and the only treatment to be an abortion.

Article/Post Source

Get involved!

Get Connected!

Come and join our community. Expand your network and get to know new people!

Comments

No comments yet